IU-Green believes that the adoption of its proposals to the tax ordinance will benefit citizens who struggle the most to take these taxes, increase revenue and get the City to provide better quality services.
From IU-Green indicates that the idea of ​​the government team to update the CPI (Consumer Price Index) with the drop of 0.9% was generic and inadequate in some taxes.
At present there is a cadastral revision in term of allegations that affects a very important part of it difficult to know the real property tax revenues (tax and real property) Urban expected to enter the Hall in 2016. IU-Greens achieved a drop 3% for this tax, without sacrificing possible declines in the future, once the total cadastral revisions know.
Remember that assessed values ​​are fundamental to this tax and are calculated according to the housing market in 2005, which require urgent review of these values ​​as well have asked for a motion.
They say that the assessed value of a home can not exceed 50% of the market value currently have.
This revision of values ​​allow this tax is more fair and to decline in many buildings the rateable value.
IU-Greens claim that property tax revenues will remain and may grow even though this reduction is applied.
They also believe that you should maintain a responsible position for the municipality and that is as favorable as possible to Jumillano Jumillano.
Qualifying lowering the 10% proposed by the PP to the buildings of urban nature as exorbitant and irresponsible because still the result of revenues that will facilitate the review of assessed values ​​is unknown.
They declare that taxes citizens are paying the services offered by the City Council, reversing in Jumillano Jumillano own.
A decline as high taxes mean less and poorer services, so ask sense and coherence to the proposals.
In the tax rate of BICES (real estate tax special features such as solar and photovoltaic) they requested an increase of 1.3%.
This increase that would face large enterprises increase revenues Hall.
IAE (Tax on Economic Activities), the IU-Greens amendment modified the original text for the IPC did not apply in this case because the tax is paid only companies with incomes above one million euros.
In another of its amendments they have succeeded in reducing the cost of telecare by 50%.
They argue that pensions do not rise in proportion to the basic expenses such as water, electricity or gas.
Most users of this service are pensioners, who see their pension does not rise in proportion to the costs water, electricity and gas.
Claim to be consistent with your electoral program and the usual line, unlike the PP, which has been able to have an absolute majority four years, not a single amendment admit budgets or ordinances and now propose many downs that did not when he sent a few months ago.
Finally cataloged opportunistic and vindictive politics PP, which leads them even propose nothing in the Advisory Committees, which is the site where you can discuss and lighter advance.
They respect this right can also be used, but they believe that economic issues should be treated with the utmost rigor and with as much time as possible to be studied.
Source: IU-verdes Jumilla