IU-Green contradicts the statements of the Mayor, Enrique Jimenez, which states that three years have reduced by 60% municipal debt.
The total debt in exchange corporation was 14.37 million, well below the figure of about 16 million naming the Mayor.
IU-Greens explain that your data are reportedly exchange corporation and intervention treasury and the City Council know whether the data used by the PP for assessment are the same or come from audits commissioned from external agencies.
Indicate that in this legislature have approved some prescription records debts that have made that not everything posted is actually paid.
CARM added that the City was 1.25 million euros and that also damaged the City's indebtedness.
IU-Green does not defend the former corporation management, as even he was in danger the payroll, but believe that the public is entitled to know all economic data.
About the plan of payment to suppliers, have to agree on priority in payment, but disagree on the 600,000 euros have been wasted paying a high interest or refinance at a lower interest loan is a saving but the end of a financial burden.
PP management has meant higher taxes, adjustments and cuts hard in IU-Greens do not share.
Remember that it was quite possible that large energy service providers and have accepted payment conditions more bearable, but the PP no business with them and the loan could not be decreased.
With regard to the adjustment plan, the PP was chosen so quick and easy;
cuts, layoffs, wage freezes downs and less temporary jobs and poorer services.
IU-Greens proposed to control the extraction of the quarries, but had to spend three years to enter the City provides 400,000 euros for this item, money annually would have avoided many of the cuts made.
In addition, the option of IU-Green was to improve efficiency in the management of current expenditure pool, street lighting and air conditioning.
They believe that all such actions have prevented other less desirable.
With 2 more in anticipation of revenue taxes and fees million, according to IU-Greens concern is that the debt will not fall.
Come exaggerated the amount of fees and taxes, especially the urban IBI which remains negative reviewed by the PP.
Suggest that regional PP is unable to reclaim enough money and the Autonomous Community has an unaffordable debt harms Jumilla by lack of investment in infrastructure.
They claim that the government team of Jumilla has not made any own management, and has been limited to meet specified by the Central Government, such as tax increases, privatization, reduction of wages, eliminating jobs and poorer quality services.
Finish by saying that the alleged "improvements" that the PP sold at the macro level are not reflected in people.
They agree that "The words can be interpreted as desired, but the numbers are what they are" and these are the numbers that brings IU-Greens.
Source: IU-verdes Jumilla