Portal de Jumilla
www.portaldejumilla.com
Last Monday was held on regular full-February and one of the highlights was the initial approval of the Special Plan of a Historical Jumilla, PEPCHA, that did not have full support, because of votes against People's Party and Greens IU.
If approved, unanimously, two motions filed by PP and IU Verdes.
The first on the urgent convening of the Special Committee on Monitoring of temporary contracts and the second on the recovery of sums paid by the digital canon.
About PEPCHA before the start of the debate involved a representative of the Association of Construction showed surprise at the treatment of this document in this whole, "when we have been working for four years and now aims to fast track approval I think we should have discussed more for the general good, "he said, adding that" if approved regardless of nuances that we will be an outrage, as it is a vital document. "
The representative of the association announced the submission of a dossier with all the nuances they pose to the PEPCHA.
Then the mayor said that "while respecting everyone's opinion, the law sets a period of claims to this document."
Abellán said "political representatives also defend the public interest, after many years of work the PEPCHA is finished and here you decide what to do with the document."
The maximum local authority recalled that this document has been working on for over four years, with more than 12 meetings with different sectors involved, has been full twice, with an initial document that was presented to the public and the some modifications were made "with the two solutions have completed work or sleep or leave it out and pass, so we bring it here, if passed will go to the Autonomous Communities, then there will be exposed and then claims."
After exposure of the mayor, both Green and Partido Popular IU explained his vote against the initial approval on PEPCHA.
IU spokesman for the Greens José Antonio Pérez, the fundamental problem for this plan is the economic situation, so that "we prefer the wisdom and know the real numbers before starting this procedure."
According to Perez "must submit a document, but that does not compromise either economically, since it carries most of the municipal investment."
For PP spokeswoman Maria Dolores Fernandez, also the general interest must prevail, but "we are also concerned about the economic issue and all activities involving the PEPCHA."
For Fernandez "in this document has ignored our input and has many doubts."
After discussion, the point was only with the votes of PSOE and IU against Green and PP, so it did not go ahead.
In the same plenary session was approved unanimously a motion filed by the PP with the requesting urgent convening of the Special Committee on Monitoring of temporary contracts and that meets every 10 days, in order, said the Enrique Jimenez spokesman "to clarify all the doubts that exist in certain contracts."
In this regard, Green IU spokesman noted that "this special committee should be what it was created, and should focus on the specific issue."
Finally, Personal Councilwoman Yolanda Fernandez stated that "we agree, since all contracts are legal and everything is done with complete transparency."
As to the motion presented by IU Verdes, it seeks to claim the amounts that the City has paid for the digital canon.
According to group spokesman José Antonio Pérez proponent "is a fee and there are unjust sentences for these returns."
Perez said that for different items such as computers, printers, photocopiers, etc.
the municipality pays a minimum of 7,000 euros, "we ask the return of such amounts in payment of the City Council is totally unjustified."
Was approved unanimously by the municipal groups.
Additionally, this full, initially adopted Internal Regulations of Day Care Center to Alzheimer and other dementias, as well as the tax price of this center and public involvement in the public domain of the new Center Services Social.
Source: Ayuntamiento de Jumilla
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies