Portal de Jumilla

www.portaldejumilla.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

Among the mandatory information was the budgetary settlement for fiscal year 2017, which, while yielding positive results in terms of surpluses, is not in respect of the spending rule, which is again being violated by the local government.

The aforementioned breach forces Juana Guardiola and her team to prepare an Economic Financial Plan to correct the excess expenses last year for 1,300,000 euros.

Correction that is hampered because at this time of year, Jumilla still does not have approved budgets and is still working with the extended and with the consequent restrictions on management.

On the other hand, the data of the average period of payment of the first quarter is almost at the edge of the legally established 30 days, which undoubtedly brings back into question the management capacity of the local government.

With respect to the issues of debate, the popular group defended two motions, one of them relating to the municipal cemetery, was rejected with a cocky attitude by the Councilor for Services, unbefitting a local government, and reminiscent of another departure from tone of the same mayor a few months ago.

The second of the initiatives defended by the popular group, the one on adopting measures that reduce allergy problems due to tree species in public areas of the town was approved, and now we hope that it will be carried out.

We wish that at least this be carried out since there are dozens of motions that have been approved, even unanimously, and nothing has been done to get them going, just remember the one regarding the smells that we have been suffering for months and what is not absolutely nothing has been done.

During the question and answer period, we reiterated the question about the date on which the draft of the 2018 budget will be presented, a question that was not answered as many times in the past.

Regarding the municipal budgets, the Spokeswoman of the Popular Group has indicated that it is not valid as an excuse that the Auditor left in March, "because at that time the budgets had to have a quarter of validity".

Source: PP Jumilla