Portal de Jumilla

www.portaldejumilla.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

Yesterday, we held an extraordinary plenary session to address two issues of vital importance to Jumilla.

One referred to the allegations of the initial approval of the Guidelines for Planning and Spatial Development Plan of the District of Highlands.

This item was approved unanimously by the three groups, with the proviso that the report referred to the villages, IU-LV and PP abstained.

You saw the allegations to the public inquiry to study the environmental impact of the proposed new layout of the road linking North Calasparra in Jumilla.

This issue came to the favorable votes of PSOE and IU-LV despite voting against PP.

The plenum was attended by over fifty people who are affected by these issues.

On the first point, according to the Mayor and Councillor for Works and Urbanism "the arguments in this paper revolve around the principle of interference with local autonomy, as the CCAA wants to regulate things that are the exclusive responsibility of municipalities, as a result This interference is detrimental to the interests of the municipality. "

Abellán added that "Jumilla has a General Urban Plan, so he did not need this document which is completely abolished the criterion of the people."

According to the mayor in "These guidelines mark, from Murcia, everything related to building land, protected areas, the installation of wind farms and clean energy future paths of highway, rural land in parishes, in general, brand planning territory. "

Abellán, noting that "the three political groups have agreed to defend the interests of Jumilla, also invited all residents to submit their claims and that we all in the same way."

At this point, the spokesman for IU-LV, José Antonio Pérez, said that it is a "very closed, little based and should have been more participatory."

Perez said that "we agree to defend local interests and which mainly affect the districts so they have no protection as excessive, but do not share the theme of suburbia, so we voted for most of the report and we decline in the latter part. "

The same position held from the municipal group of PP, his spokesman Enrique Jimenez said that "we all agree to defend this matter, we must not allow the breach of the principle of local authority and this paper goes into many tasks which are governed in the General Plan. "

Northern Highway

At the extraordinary plenary session were the arguments to the public inquiry the Environmental Impact Assessment Project of the Northern Highway, Jumilla-Calasparra section.

Despite the vote against the PP, approved point out the favorable votes of PSOE and IU-LV.

In this issue, the Autonomous Community has a new proposal since the initial project has already filed claims because the track affected very directly to the mountain of Santa Ana, some of which have been taken into account for the new path.

The Mayor reported that at this step, the City presented again, a claim which, with technical reports, states that "view of specification we believe that improves the initial alternative, but it's still much better approach the layout of the road parallel to the ring of the N-344 as it passes through Jumilla, our proposal would be optimal. "

Abellán adds that "although the highway does not go through the best place, which would be attached to the ring, the second proposal is better than the first as it moves to the Prado, about a mile, but we insist that the best option is parallel to the ring. "

In this case, the IU-LV spokesman said: "Our group maintains the position it had in December where we argued that the best route is the closest to the N-344, although this second proposal is less harmful than the first."

Finally, Enrique Jimenez, spokesman of the PP explained his vote against the argument that "they agree with some arguments and not with others."

Source: Ayuntamiento de Jumilla